魁北克的“民主”-漏洞百出的破渔网

justiceQC

“民主”这顶高帽在魁北克的某些权威机构已经漏洞百出，形同渔网。Regie du logement， 魁省的租房委员会，对于任何租金涨幅的案例居然纵容房东当庭提交所谓“证据”并当庭撤回，只给房客几分钟甚至没有质疑时间，以致于房东伪造证据已经到了肆无忌惮的地步，反正只是骗骗只管按公式计算的所谓“法官”，剥夺处于社会劣势房客的起码司法权益：有合理时间质疑证据。



“民主”这顶高帽，在魁北克已经是魁北克人的至高权益、以及对穆斯林难民的政治正确权益的代名词，其他少数族裔，因为你是守法公民，因为你只会怒而不争，更不会向那些因惯用暴力而获得特别权益的族裔靠拢，所以，你就是几百年来、以及未来的几百年必然的社会底层。太多的实例证明，即便一朝是叱咤风云的华人精英，也逃不脱被边缘、被打压、被底层化的命运；更多当下人前风光的白领精英，躲在暗处的苦水可曾向谁倾诉？


越来越多的穆斯林难民房客，早晚会知道光鲜的魁北克“民主”，原来不过是张破渔网，钱权交易、政治资本积累的工具，今朝的幸运儿，保不齐是明朝的牺牲品。


魁北克的司法系统究竟是否也是魁北克“民主”渔网上的一个洞，近期有案情揭晓......

justiceQC

为加拿大、尤其是魁北克的“民主、司法”点睛的视频：

Justin Trudeau refuses to answer a simple question... 18 TIMES!

justiceQC

Commissioner， Regie du logement 的法官，当他以“you can appeal”（你可以上诉）的理由拒绝一个合理正当的revocation（重审）请求时，判决书附件却写着这一类案例不可上诉。

当一个裁决庭的法官的话都不可信的话，魁北克的司法不是笑话吗？
当房东一方只在庭讯时出示所谓“证据”，随后立刻把这些所谓“证据”带出法庭，不留痕迹，令房客无从抗辩，魁北克的司法不是笑话吗？
当房客的基本抗诉权益被行政裁决庭（administrative trabunal）系统性剥夺时，魁北克的司法不是笑话吗？
魁北克的司法是独立的，还是和腐败的行政系统沆瀣一气，COURT OF QUEBEC, WE ARE WATCHING YOU!

justiceQC

法官上庭为什么要穿法袍？

"The robe is considered a reminder of the law and a symbol of neutrality." (https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=145211) 法袍是法律警醒，公正无私的象征。
然而，Court of Quebec魁省法庭竟然出现了法官不穿法袍出庭的异象。接下来异象更是接踵而来： 法官询问当事人需要多长时间陈述案情，当事人回答后他说：好，会排在稍后，因为用时比较长。然而，当庭讯正式开始时，这位不着法袍的法官儿戏般地说：“我看过你的动议了，我要否决你的动议，我给你解释”，没有给当事人任何陈述的时间，直接口授裁决......

这样看来，他不穿法袍就意味深长了......

“If he were a Muslim, things would have been different” -Appeal in Public for the Systematically Bullying and Lying Legal System in Quebec

1.        For any Rent Fixation case, the Régie du logement (Rental board) of Quebec systematically allows landlords to produce evidences during and only during the hearing and then withdraw them immediately after the hearing, deprived in fact tenants of their fundamental rights of contesting and defending;

2.        For any Rent Fixation case, the commissioner(judge)s of the Régie du logement care only if landlords provide “good-looking” evidences and they will merely do a calculation without questioning if the evidences are genuine, refuse to give a chance to the tenants to prove bad faith of the landlords, including repeatedly lying under oath**;

3.        Although Art. 89 of the Act respecting the Régie du logement says “Where a decision has been rendered against a party who was prevented from producing or supplying evidence by surprise, by fraud or by any other reason considered sufficient, that party may apply for the revocation of the decision”, the Revocation Commissioner said “it was not about revocation, what you asked is an appeal and you can appeal”;

4.        The Revocation Commissioner refused the revocation request and the tenants found that what the Commissioner promised was against Art. 91 of the Act that denies the possibility of appeal in such case;

5.        In light of the criteria for appealing a decision of the Régie :” a serious, new, controversial or general interest issue; the contested decision presents an apparent weakness, a manifest or gross error in the assessment of the facts; a material error in the administration of the evidence; denial of justice for non-observance of the rules of natural justice.” - Birkhof c. Tandel, 2010 QCCQ 596, the Tenant filed an application for leave to appeal in Court of Quebec;

6.        During the Court Presentation, the judge (not in judge’s robe) asked the tenants how long they need to present their case and the tenants said an hour because it might be the last and only chance for them to be heard. The judge said ok and asked them to wait. When the hearing began, without letting the tenants say anything, the judge said your application is being rejected and I will tell you why. He said the commissioner (judge) of first instance made a mistake but he refused to grant an appeal for it. Anything else he said has nothing new to the tenants. The judge then dictated his pre-rendered decision and asked the tenants to leave;

7.        The tenants did whatever Robert Chu* did: wrote letters to the Prime Minister, the Justice of Quebec, politicians who acted without any credit, promised to reply and no reply, promised to do things and then silenced;

8.        The important thing is that the tenants are Chinese in Quebec, Canada. Many Chinese people liked the most hot comment given to Robert Chu’s death: “if he were a Muslim, things would have been different.”

* : https://www.thestar.com/news/can ... l-school-grads.html
** Keywords : Grégor Des Rosiers, a commissioner in the Régie du logement,  Sarah Bissonnette, a lawyer in Droit Locatif et Immobilier, Gestion Immobilière Inc.
*** : http://bbs.51.ca/thread-838976-1-1.html

justiceQC

Régie du logement 的revocation（撤销前判）庭讯法官在事实就是法条（Art. 89 of the Act respecting the Régie du logement ）的经典范例的情况下居然还说“你这是上诉（appeal）内容，不是revocation的事情，你可以上诉。” ，然后他不止一次信誓旦旦地承诺当事人可以上诉，虽然他说的其实和Art. 91相反。但上诉的依据是：有事实错误、法理错误、以及公平原则的重大失误，所以理论上这是可以上诉的。然而，Court of Quebec法庭的法官居然没有穿法袍出庭（联想他的离奇判决，这背后没有隐情吗？！），他说Régie du logement 的revocation（撤销前判）庭讯法官犯了错，但却不给当事人上诉机会，形同彻底剥夺上诉人的基本应诉权利，不给当事人任何陈述案情的机会，直接把预先已经得出的结论口述，这是发生在魁北克法院的荒谬而真实一幕！

半岛文化

政治就是少数人统治多数人的工具