Let’s take a look at the media who reported the issue. Thomson Reuters, didn’t you fraudulently bill your clients for government priority fees that you never transferred to the government?
In 2014, when Thomson Reuters billed its clients for a priority request of a provincial incorporation in Quebec, it charged their clients $319 ,plus $159.50 as “priority government fees”:
But the total amount it transferred to the government was only $319:
One month after the fraudulently billing was being reported into the Company’s ethic department, there was a covering-up payment done, but only for the reported dossier:
Other similar dossiers remain the same, no such “priority government fee” was transferred to the government but the Company billed its client for such “priority government fee”.
After cover-up, the Company concluded that they did not find evidences and the reporter’s employment was terminated one day after the conclusion was made. No outside investigation was done and people say it’s a deep pocket.